<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Problems With Google Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/11/30/the-problems-with-google-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/11/30/the-problems-with-google-search/</link>
	<description>Independent and intellectual thoughts ranging from China, SEO, Analytics, and other international topics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google Knol, Yahoo Answers, and Korean Search Engine Naver - Demerzel's Blog - Independent &#38; Intellectual Analysis on Politics, China, SEO, and Gaming</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/11/30/the-problems-with-google-search/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Knol, Yahoo Answers, and Korean Search Engine Naver - Demerzel's Blog - Independent &#38; Intellectual Analysis on Politics, China, SEO, and Gaming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/11/30/the-problems-with-google-search/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>[...] from across the web creating duplicate content issues that Google still cannot detect through its ‘artificial intelligence’ particularly with RSS feeds, in turn creating complaints of infringements on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from across the web creating duplicate content issues that Google still cannot detect through its ‘artificial intelligence’ particularly with RSS feeds, in turn creating complaints of infringements on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demerzel</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/11/30/the-problems-with-google-search/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Demerzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 00:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/11/30/the-problems-with-google-search/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Yes, those subscribing to the feed go directly. Those searching in Google will be sent to Chinalyst first. Firefox/IE would have nothing to do with how one enters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, those subscribing to the feed go directly. Those searching in Google will be sent to Chinalyst first. Firefox/IE would have nothing to do with how one enters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 陈 俊宇</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/11/30/the-problems-with-google-search/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>陈 俊宇</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/11/30/the-problems-with-google-search/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I subscribe to Chinalyst's RSS feed so when I click on a title that looks interesting, it brings me directly to your blog actually. I would think most computer knowledgeable people would be using Firefox and doing the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I subscribe to Chinalyst&#8217;s RSS feed so when I click on a title that looks interesting, it brings me directly to your blog actually. I would think most computer knowledgeable people would be using Firefox and doing the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demerzel</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/11/30/the-problems-with-google-search/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Demerzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/11/30/the-problems-with-google-search/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>And you're absolutely correct on only using the summary feeds, but its still interesting nonetheless that Google cannot differentiate between the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you&#8217;re absolutely correct on only using the summary feeds, but its still interesting nonetheless that Google cannot differentiate between the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fili</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/11/30/the-problems-with-google-search/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Fili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 13:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/11/30/the-problems-with-google-search/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Which is why you should only use summary feeds with Chinalyst, as is suggested all over the site. This would prevent most duplicate content issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which is why you should only use summary feeds with Chinalyst, as is suggested all over the site. This would prevent most duplicate content issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
