Independent and intellectual thoughts ranging from China, SEO, Analytics, and other international topics
21 Oct
On my daily or so read of Matt Cutts, he tries to note what hidden text would equate to on television:
Now, I understand what he is trying to get at (although I believe having a millisecond subliminal ad would have been a better comparison), but I believe the best comparison would be invisible ink that you can write on a newspaper for coded messages. TV does not have the ability for this (although you could put in backward speeches, but that’s another thing entirely).
I’m more interested in the concept of “visible, but hidden” text.
Quoting a long ago Matt Cutts’s post:
If you’re going to hide text, doing “#EEEEEE” instead of solid white isn’t really an improvement. In fact, it can look worse, as if you’re trying to choose a text color that won’t be exactly the same as the background color, but still won’t be noticed.
Now, keyword spamming is a violation of Google’s TOS and I have no disagreement there, but the nearly hidden text is a legit and actual improvement. But, for fun’s sake let’s play a game of what you’re trying to hide in a sea of other things based on it not really being an improvement:
The point? There are legitimate uses for the variety of ways to show text, whether it’s subtle colors for better design, legal issues of privacy and EULAs, explanations for a family vacation, relevant text ads, and breaking news. The intent of why you display information is more important than the how (or at least should be).