<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Demerzel's Blog - Intellectual Analysis on China, SEO, Analytics, and the Web &#187; algorithm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.micahfk.com/blog/tag/algorithm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog</link>
	<description>Independent and intellectual thoughts ranging from China, SEO, and other international topics</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Reliance on Quality Raters is the Death Knell for Google</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/03/16/google-death-knell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/03/16/google-death-knell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Demerzel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Results]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/03/16/google-death-knell/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the full text of Google&#8217;s general guidelines leaked  on remote quality raters (April 2007  version &#8212; PDF) , one can really envision the immense problems that Google is having with its algorithm. A company that proclaimed itself as being able to algorithmically determine what should rank well across the web has been [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/03/16/google-death-knell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is There Really Such a Thing as Too Much Data?</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/03/04/too-much-data/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/03/04/too-much-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 06:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Demerzel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[researching]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/03/04/too-much-data/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A short article over at Inc.com about workers struggling with data overloading made me consider whether or not we really are overloaded with data. Personally I believe that there is certainly such a thing as data overload, but that this does not necessarily mean that important information is easier lost in the long-run for everyone.
Yes, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/03/04/too-much-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Science</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/seo-science/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/seo-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Demerzel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[regression analysis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[statistical analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/seo-science/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization is still in the early stages of turning hypotheses and theories into a form of science. SEO science in my opinion delve beyond just purely stating what has happened or taking guesses, but rather using complicated econometric formulas for regression analysis via panel data. Of course, the idea of running econometric analysis [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/seo-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Knol, Yahoo Answers, and Korean Search Engine Naver</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/12/18/google-knol-yahoo-answers-and-korean-search-engine-naver/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/12/18/google-knol-yahoo-answers-and-korean-search-engine-naver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Demerzel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Korea]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Results]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Naver]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rss]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Answers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/12/18/google-knol-yahoo%e2%80%99s-answers-and-korean-search-engine-naver/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google announced a few days ago its vision to essentially mash together a Wikipedia like site with a Squidoo layout essentially desiring to have a competitive online encyclopedia that has ads. Beyond the horrible name, this product may come to haunt Google in the long-run becoming a turning point its perceived status as an honest [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/12/18/google-knol-yahoo-answers-and-korean-search-engine-naver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Truly Greyhat SEO: When SEO Experts Disagree on Whether Paid Links are Whitehat or Blackhat</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/12/06/truly-greyhat-seo-when-seo-experts-disagree-on-whether-paid-links-are-whitehat-or-blackhat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/12/06/truly-greyhat-seo-when-seo-experts-disagree-on-whether-paid-links-are-whitehat-or-blackhat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 04:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Demerzel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Baidu]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blackhat seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[greyhat seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[linkbait]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pagerank]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[paid links]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[whitehat seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/12/06/truly-greyhat-seo-when-seo-experts-disagree-on-whether-paid-links-are-whitehat-or-blackhat/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has been trying to reduce the use of buying and selling links (for PageRank) since the last PR update by manually de-indexing some link broker websites along with dropping PageRank for some sites selling links. Quite a few sites selling those links became very worried and either stopped selling their links or placed the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/12/06/truly-greyhat-seo-when-seo-experts-disagree-on-whether-paid-links-are-whitehat-or-blackhat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
