<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Demerzel's Blog - Intellectual Analysis on China, SEO, Analytics, and the Web &#187; Google Search Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.micahfk.com/blog/tag/google-search-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog</link>
	<description>Independent and intellectual thoughts ranging from China, SEO, and other international topics</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Google Wishes You A Happy SERPs Holiday</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/12/15/google-wishes-you-happy-serps-holiday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/12/15/google-wishes-you-happy-serps-holiday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Demerzel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Results]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SERPs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Happy SERPs Holiday provided by Google Search Results!
For you Christmas lovers&#8211;search &#8220;Christmas&#8221;:

Not a fan of Christmas? Me either! Let&#8217;s go get some Menorahs:

Still not your cup of tea? Celebrate Kwanzaa?

Non-religious? All-encompassing? Love Seinfeld? Go Festivus!

Okay, I allow myself to be corny once in awhile with these posts&#8230;
Bookmark To:

	Related posts
	
	Future of Google Search Results (3)
	Baidu [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/12/15/google-wishes-you-happy-serps-holiday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baidu Deals With Organic &#038; Paid Results Scandal</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/11/22/baidu-paid-organic-results-scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/11/22/baidu-paid-organic-results-scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Demerzel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Baidu]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Base]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Results]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SERPs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/?p=519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Baidu has recently come to terms with media criticisms over whether Baidu allows its paid results to influence what happens in the organic results. The Wall Street Journal&#8217;s China Journal covers this in a little bit of detail noting about Baidu&#8217;s paid results response:
Last night, in a conference call with analysts, Baidu unveiled its response: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/11/22/baidu-paid-organic-results-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scraping Spam in Google Search Results</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/11/10/scraping-spam-google-search-results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/11/10/scraping-spam-google-search-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Demerzel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blackhat]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[duplicate content]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Results]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/?p=494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The Blackhats have finally caught on (publically at least) to the fact that Google is not doing a very good job with scraping sites, much less authority sites that copy and paste content from your own site. Interestingly enough, Quadzilla has noted that Yahoo is doing a relatively good job on the other hand [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/11/10/scraping-spam-google-search-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Future of Google Search Results</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/06/24/future-google-search-results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/06/24/future-google-search-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Demerzel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Results]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SERPs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more and more I see Google gobble up new areas and jump into new verticals, the more I personally envision their own search results filled with just about only their own products. For someone who works on improving client search results for SEO, this will become an ever-increasing frustration as Google&#8217;s SERPs will be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/06/24/future-google-search-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reliance on Quality Raters is the Death Knell for Google</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/03/16/google-death-knell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/03/16/google-death-knell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Demerzel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Results]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/03/16/google-death-knell/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the full text of Google&#8217;s general guidelines leaked  on remote quality raters (April 2007  version &#8212; PDF) , one can really envision the immense problems that Google is having with its algorithm. A company that proclaimed itself as being able to algorithmically determine what should rank well across the web has been [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/03/16/google-death-knell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Statistical Significance and Why Large Tests Matter</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/02/20/seo-statistical-significance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/02/20/seo-statistical-significance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Demerzel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Econometrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Index]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Results]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[regression analysis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[statistical analysis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[statistical significance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/02/20/seo-statistical-significance/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ran across a hot topic on Sphinn titled &#8220;Google Showing Bias Towards .org TLDs&#8221; and thought to take a look at how other sites/people are trying to run tests on what matters to Google. I am always appreciative to see people trying to run tests that go beyond just pure guesses as I&#8217;ve stated [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/02/20/seo-statistical-significance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/02/13/google-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/02/13/google-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 04:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Demerzel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Results]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/02/13/google-internet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everything I learned about Google and the Internet, oh wait, Google is wanting to be the Internet&#8230;:
Breaking Down Their “Tools”, and Their Purpose

E-Commerce

Google Checkout - There is no business that makes money like the money business. Stepping into Paypal’s shoes, this service is not massive…yet. I have an odd feeling the plans for this are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/02/13/google-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese Dissident Suing Search Engines</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/02/11/chinese-dissident-suing-search-engines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/02/11/chinese-dissident-suing-search-engines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Demerzel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Results]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/02/11/chinese-dissident-suing-search-engines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s my comment via the article at UK Times Online on Slashdot:
 You can follow three paths as a search engine (in simplistic terms):
1) Show everything&#8211;this implies crap sites (*coughs* boingboing), great sites (*coughs*
 /.), malware sites (3221.com), search results sites, etc. thereupon your results are fully awful, but absolutely representative of what a search engine [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2008/02/11/chinese-dissident-suing-search-engines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Knol, Yahoo Answers, and Korean Search Engine Naver</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/12/18/google-knol-yahoo-answers-and-korean-search-engine-naver/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/12/18/google-knol-yahoo-answers-and-korean-search-engine-naver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Demerzel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Korea]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Results]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Naver]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rss]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Answers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/12/18/google-knol-yahoo%e2%80%99s-answers-and-korean-search-engine-naver/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google announced a few days ago its vision to essentially mash together a Wikipedia like site with a Squidoo layout essentially desiring to have a competitive online encyclopedia that has ads. Beyond the horrible name, this product may come to haunt Google in the long-run becoming a turning point its perceived status as an honest [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/12/18/google-knol-yahoo-answers-and-korean-search-engine-naver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Search Results Skirmish</title>
		<link>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/11/26/google-search-results-skirmish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/11/26/google-search-results-skirmish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 07:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Demerzel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Results]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/11/26/google-search-results-skirmish/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fascinating exchange between Mr. Google (Matt Cutts) and Johnon (John Andrews) about Google Search Results and how essentially the results are becoming increasingly irrelevant to online users, but with that said, Google&#8217;s Search Results are still far and above better than anything out there at this point in time. Of the conversation about Google [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micahfk.com/blog/2007/11/26/google-search-results-skirmish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
